The Do Cool Shit Budget
Ring-fence 15% of your budget for work that is disqualified if it has a measurable immediate payoff.
- Difficulty
- Easy
- Time to result
- ~months to results
- Steps
- 6
- Confidence
- 85%
Shaan Puri's observation is that intent is not the constraint — teams genuinely mean to do interesting work, and then a month later the budget feels tight or the numbers are being missed, and the first thing cut is whatever doesn't map cleanly to this quarter's result. His fix is structural: carve out a separate budget, 15% of the total, ring-fenced for work whose defining criterion is that it has no measurable immediate payoff. The inversion is deliberate — an activity is disqualified from this budget if you can attribute revenue to it, because anything attributable will survive on its own merits and doesn't need protection. He ran this at Bebo and attempted it again at Twitch, and cites a mock Apple-style commercial made for the Milk Road rebrand that would not drive subscribers or revenue. His justification has two halves. Internally, it keeps him amused, engaged and a fan of his own business, which he believes pays off indirectly through his own effort. Externally, customers read it as status: a company visibly doing cool things for their own sake looks like the cool kid at school, whereas constantly running discounts and begging for subscriptions reads as low status. Girdley and Sam supply the same instinct from other angles — Black Rifle Coffee sponsoring rally cars because 'what's the point of having this company if we can't do dope shit', and The Hustle sending an email that was a picture of Johnny Cash telling 120,000 readers to close the browser and get back to work.
Origin
Shaan created a separate ring-fenced budget line at Bebo after noticing that a shared commitment to doing cool work reliably evaporated within a month of being agreed.
Core principles
- 01Intent is not the constraint — protection is.
- 02Attributable payoff disqualifies the spend; unattributable is the point.
- 03Anything that maps to this quarter will survive without protection.
- 04Your own engagement in your business is itself a return.
- 05Doing cool things unprompted reads as high status to customers.
- 06Constant discounting and begging reads as low status.
How to run it
- 1
Create a separate budget line
Shaan's version is explicitly separate — roughly 15% of total budget — because a shared intention inside the main budget is what gets cut.
- 2
Set the disqualifying criterion
The work cannot have a measurable immediate payoff. Anything attributable is ineligible and should be funded normally.
- 3
Spend it on genuinely unattributable work
Shaan's examples: making a flamethrower, or paying someone to produce a mock Apple commercial for the Milk Road rebrand that won't drive subscribers or revenue.
- 4
Defend the line under pressure
The whole mechanism exists for the moment budgets tighten and deadlines slip. If it is negotiable then, it doesn't work.
- 5
Judge it on engagement, not attribution
Shaan's internal test is whether it keeps him amused, engaged and a fan of his own business — which he believes pays off through his own effort.
- 6
Read the external signal
Customers notice. Doing cool things for their own sake positions you as the cool kid; perpetual discounting and pleading for subscribers positions you as low status.
In the wild
Shaan ran the 15% carve-out at Bebo and tried to run it again at Twitch, with the explicit rule that eligible work could not have a measurable immediate payoff.
→ A structural home for work that would otherwise have been the first casualty of every tight quarter.
Sam's team sent 120,000 subscribers an email whose subject promised the only productivity tip they needed. Inside was a picture of Johnny Cash flipping off the camera and the line 'close this browser and get back to work'. They also once wrote an entire newsletter in Donald Trump's voice.
→ People warned he'd lose money and customers; readers loved it. Sam's rationale was simply that it was hilarious.
Sam asked the company why they sponsor dirt rally racing and mountain biking. The answer: 'because it's freaking awesome — what's the point of having this company if we can't do dope shit?'
→ A coffee company that functions as a lifestyle brand, taken public at a valuation Sam put around $600-700 million.
Common mistakes
Leaving it as an intention rather than a line item
This is the exact failure Shaan designed around. A shared commitment to do cool work survives about a month before the budget tightens.
Letting attributable work into the budget
If a project can show ROI it will get funded anyway. Admitting it dilutes the carve-out and defeats its purpose.
Cutting it first when numbers slip
The protection only means something under pressure. Cutting it in a tight quarter is identical to never having created it.
Is it for you?
Best for
Founders and marketing leaders whose brand-building work keeps getting cut when quarterly numbers tighten.
Not ideal for
Businesses in genuine survival mode, where a 15% discretionary carve-out is not available at any price.
From the transcript
“we created a separate do cool shit budget it was 15% of our total budget ... whatever the number is that we have to spend…”
“what's the first thing you cut is the stuff that doesn't easily map to this quarter's result”
“if they see you doing dope shit just for the sake of doing dope shit they kind of see you as the cool kid in…”
From the episode
Michael Girdley: Why Fireworks Are A Cash Cow and How to Operate a Holdco Worth $100 Million
Michael Girdley